World of Wrestling Forums
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

World of Wrestling Forums

The Best Damn Wrestling Forum Out There.Talk about wrestling and come join our efed USW alongside UWC
 
HomePortalSearchLatest imagesRegisterLog in

World of Wrestling Forums :: general stuff :: Debate league
 

 (open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue

Go down 
AuthorMessage
The Instant Classic
Admin
Admin
The Instant Classic


Male Number of posts : 868
Age : 30
Location : sydney australia
Registration date : 2007-12-31

(open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue Empty
PostSubject: (open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue   (open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue Icon_minitimeMon Jan 28, 2008 2:28 pm
well choose your sides
Back to top Go down
The Instant Classic
Admin
Admin
The Instant Classic


Male Number of posts : 868
Age : 30
Location : sydney australia
Registration date : 2007-12-31

(open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue Empty
PostSubject: Re: (open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue   (open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue Icon_minitimeMon Jan 28, 2008 2:28 pm
I agree GNR were more successful so im in
Back to top Go down
 
(open)Guns n roses were bigger than motley crue
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» (open) Should Vince buy TNA?
» (Open) Tomko a future Main eventer?
» (Debate Open)Jim ross is overated
» (open)Mankind or Cactus Jack?
» (open)Was the Ultimate Warrior really that awful?

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
World of Wrestling Forums :: general stuff :: Debate league-
Jump to: